OK, wich 1 of you retards is this...

[zigroid]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41476929...ope/?GT1=43001

LONDON — A man with a low IQ has been banned from sex by a judge who said the case raised questions about civil liberties, The Telegraph newspaper reported.

The 41-year-old man, known as Alan, has an IQ of 48 and a moderate learning disability, the newspaper reported. Alan was living with a man and having sex with him.

His local council decided that his "vigorous sex drive" was not appropriate and he didn't understand what he was doing, the Telegraph reported.

High Court Justice Nicholas Mostyn agreed that Alan did not have the mental capacity to understand the health risks and should not have sex with anyone. The judge's order put Alan under the local authority that provides his housing.

Still, the judge called the case "legally, intellectually and morally" complex and said the court must "tread especially carefully" when the state tries to curtail such a basic human function as sex.

The case began in June 2009, when the local council started court proceedings to restrict Alan's contact with the man, identified as Kieron. Alan has been prevented since then from sexual activity, except when he's alone, the Telegraph's report said.

In Britain, the Court of Protection can make decisions for people deemed to lack the intelligence to make them themselves. These people can be ordered to undergo surgery, have abortions, be forced to use contraception — even have life support switched off.

Alan was described as "sociable" but “seriously challenged in all aspects of his mental functionality.” He had been accused of making lewd gestures at children, but no police action was taken, the Telegraph said.

there must be a european chapter hidden or invite only on this site cause I know somoen here had 2 do this lol WHOS ALAN hahaha

[DC2.2GSR]

unf**kingbelievable. I don't care how handicapped someone is, "the State" (Govt. of any kind) has absolutely NO business telling anyone what they can and cannot do with their bodies, unless they're infringing upon someone else's rights. If someone wants to procreate (or even just have consensual sex for fun), it's their natural right to do so, regardless of their mental state.

That man, or maybe even both of them, need guidance from fully aware and mentally stable individuals (normal people), but there's no excuse for butting into their lives and outlawing what is a private matter. All of this 'protect you from yourselves' bulls*** makes me sick.

[lownslow95]

I don't think its anyone on here, since I don't think anyone on here lives in London. I personally think its the OP just trying to post **** to get his post count up.

[R22B]

Wait, they are telling someone that is handicapped that they can't have sex!? That seems like this stepping over the line a little bit...

[AutobahnRacer]

100% agreed. This man could become very rich should someone advise him to get a lawyer.

[jspek]

its england, i am not surprised.

[Oakes]

Originally Posted by Carministrator

100% agreed. This man could become very rich should someone advise him to get a lawyer.

Ah, the American way!

[SovXietday]

Originally Posted by Oakes

Ah, the American way!

Erm, it's in London?

This is a little absurd, especially reading that last little tidbit. Basically if you're mentally challenged you don't get to choose your own actions legally. Like, whether or not to get surgery, use a condom, or even live. So messed up.

[AutobahnRacer]

lol just noticed too, but the spelling of the thread title matches the IQ

OK, wich 1 of you retards is this...

[OutToWinPAHC]

I am not that retard... I cant get laid.

[Fujito]

The Brits just don't want the stupid gene to be passed along.

It's a matter of national security.

[fballman1987]

Originally Posted by Fujito

The Brits just don't want the stupid gene to be passed along.

It's a matter of national security.

this method would benefit the united states.

[Oakes]

Originally Posted by SovXietday

Erm, it's in London?

I was referring to the idea to sue and get loads of money for something

[Honduh]

I say let the two gay retards pound each others butts until they don't want to do it anymore.

[DPancoast]

wow thats out of control!

[Devilsfan118]

Clearly this article is about Ndubz. Everything fits!

And I might have a lead about the other man in the relationship...can't confirm it yet, but it might be ScarletSaturn.


But in all seriousness, to remove someone's right to procreate/casually have sex is ridiculous. Unless the said individual was in some way harming someone else in doing so or something.

[jpalamar]

The is retarded for lack of a better word. I'm amazed that kids that pork are OK but someone who is mentally challenged and has about the same ability to care for a kid isn't allowed. Plus its dude on dude so they won't even be a welfare baby in the end so who cares what happens behind closed doors.

[Scapegoat]

i think the argument is that the person in question is not capable of discerning the sexual requests made upon them and could be construed similarly molestation. maybe he doesnt know what he's doing is wrong but is being coerced into doing it by his "partner".

in regards to the story... this guy is mentally handicap. it shouldn't be illegal for him to have sex, but illegal for other people to have sex with him. it's nearly rape w/ an IQ that low.

[ImNickjames13]

Originally Posted by Fujito

The Brits just don't want the stupid gene to be passed along.

It's a matter of national security.

Alan was living with a man and having sex with him.

Don't think they have to worry about it

[accordguy04]

This would never happen in Amurica!