Lethal Injection...

[where'smyturbo?]

haha torture by firing squad. make them wait a bit, and for a good while hit things like the extremities.

I am a fan of corporal punishment.

[zerioustt]

Originally Posted by where'smyturbo?

haha torture by firing squad. make them wait a bit, and for a good while hit things like the extremities.

I am a fan of corporal punishment.

Capital punishment....just a heads up.

[where'smyturbo?]

ahah thanks i just woke up.

[AUTORACENBBOY]

ya know what, i wouldnt be surprised if they can feel the pain after being paralyzed, haha.
Sit there and suffer, there thinking there getting an easy ride to death then... uh oh, o **** im awake, o no o no o no, haha ur dead.

Also i feel, you should die the way you killed. And those inmates should be sold to hostels
OR MAKE "THE RUNNING MAN"

[thewake]

I am no fan of capitol punishment. If the state is going to do it, then use the best (quickest, easiest, cheapest) way to do it. The state should look to the medical community if possible for guidance. Since we don't euthanize people (as a general rule) then we need to look elsewhere and the veterinarians use a singe injection to euthanize pets. What is wrong with the states following this lead? The death of the convicted person is the goal, there should be no delight in causing unneccecary suffering. If there is a better way then the states shouldn't need to jump through massive numbers of hoops to use it, nor should they stick to old outdated methods for no good reason.

[jules]

i am personally a fan of a cell long enough to lay down in say 8ft long 8ft high and 4ft wide and a hole to poo and pee in and feed them 1x a day for life and let a woman named helga figure out what to cook for them. f'm dude i just read a guy threw 4 kids off a bridge the kids were 4mos. -3yrs. he should truely die from a plane with a blanket in his parachute that reads" hope this helps keep u warm"

[james_ls]

Eye for an eye.

Eff this ****.

If they seriously get rid of the lethal injection (which they don't use enough at all as it is) we're ****ed.

[streetAssasin96]

Originally Posted by james_ls

Eye for an eye.

Eff this ****.

If they seriously get rid of the lethal injection (which they don't use enough at all as it is) we're ****ed.

We're definitley ****ed. There are too many people out there that are like " NO NO its not humane to kill people for their actions", and then we are all the ones who hae to pay for the ****ers to stay in jail for the rest of their lives.

Personally I wouldn't car if they took away the death penalty, under one condition. THUNDERDOME!!!!!!!!! haha

[LiquidFire]

we need population control. kill those who are bad and are a drain on society. why do you think the world is more crowded now than before? cuz people arent killing each other as much. now im not sayin we need another genocide or anything, but why let them sit in a cell for the rest of their life? do you really think its gonna change them? and even if it does, why does it matter? it's not like they're gonna get a chance to go anywhere. so f it. just fry the bitch. they did what they did in a knowing manner and deserve the repercussions.

[poolmike]

Thieves used to hang for stealing another person's horse.

Some people prove over and over again that they are not fit for this world....killers, rapists, burglars, car thieves, etc. Hang them all. I'm a cheap basturd. I have a hard time parting with a penny that might feed an individual in the prison system that just can't seem to get through life without screwing up someone elses life.

[zerioustt]

Originally Posted by thewake

I am no fan of capitol punishment. If the state is going to do it, then use the best (quickest, easiest, cheapest) way to do it. The state should look to the medical community if possible for guidance. Since we don't euthanize people (as a general rule) then we need to look elsewhere and the veterinarians use a singe injection to euthanize pets. What is wrong with the states following this lead? The death of the convicted person is the goal, there should be no delight in causing unneccecary suffering. If there is a better way then the states shouldn't need to jump through massive numbers of hoops to use it, nor should they stick to old outdated methods for no good reason.

This is the thinking/attitude of why this country is going down the ****ter. They shouldn't waste any money on these animals to figure out a new way for executing them. IMO they're lucky they have so easy. So a few of them have to suffer...booo hooo. Cry me a fing river. You ever hear the old saying? "don't do the crime if you can't do the time" people rape and kill children and can honestly say they shouldn't suffer? If you answer yes to that then I have 0 respect for you, and you have 0 respect for mankind.

[K-Rex]

Originally Posted by Jeffros Spec V

On a different side of the story I know somebody who has a bumper sticker that reads "Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing is wrong?"

Nice try on baiting me into this, but won't work.

[cmr076]

people that comit these horendour crimes are sick. do you think a fully competent person could really throw children off a bridge because they were mad? while i agree they should be punished, i think "drawing and quartering" or "shooting to maim before killing" a mentally deficient individual is as barbaric and unconscionable as the original act.

While i dont have a solution, i think that using the old "eye for an eye" adage is stupid. "you killed someone, it was wrong... what we are going to do to you is exactly what we are telling you was wrong." also it has been proven that death penalty is not a deterrant of any kind (mostly due to the fact that the people that comit these crimes dont have the mental capacity to understand it as a deterrant.)

::edit:: Flame away im bored !

[thewake]

Originally Posted by zerioustt

This is the thinking/attitude of why this country is going down the ****ter. They shouldn't waste any money on these animals to figure out a new way for executing them. IMO they're lucky they have so easy. So a few of them have to suffer...booo hooo. Cry me a fing river. You ever hear the old saying? "don't do the crime if you can't do the time" people rape and kill children and can honestly say they shouldn't suffer? If you answer yes to that then I have 0 respect for you, and you have 0 respect for mankind.

I honestly feel that those people asking for making the condemned person suffer are looking for vengeance, not justice. Causing unnecessary pain and suffering is torture, and wrong. I would rather have the state seek justice than commit torture. I also think that one of the worst things you could do to a person is lock them in a cage for the rest of their life. If that life is to be ended early then it should be done quickly and quietly.

If the state is to execute the criminals (which is a very rare occurrence), then the state should pick a quick and easy method, and be free to update the method as better ones come along. The executive part of the state should not need a law passed or a court to intervene to change from one method of execution to a different one. Especially if the method is changing one set of injected chemicals to a different set of injected chemicals. The case is about asking the court to force a change in the set of chemicals, most likely the current set is fixed in the statute and can not be changed by the administration even if they wanted to, and thus have to fight in court about which injection is better. It is like fighting over should the death warrant be signed in blue or black ink.

[streetAssasin96]

THUNDERDOME FTW!!!! 2 go in only 1 comes out

[jules]

CMR076 flame on/ i must disagree and also agree with you here is why: as of now in this society people do have the capacity to kill in a perfect world no 1 would kill. but, i have heard almost every excuse in the book from the devil made me do it, to i was scared b/c i was in a gang so i had to, to i have ADD.i mean com on my nephew almost killed a man with his bare hands by choking him until he bled out of his ear's his vocal cords CRUSHED he can't talk possibly ever. my nephew's lawyer asked me to testify and say he was abused by his mom with belts. i told him nope i would say if she did it more often maybe he wouldn't have done what he did and since he acted like an animal then he should serve an animals sentence he got 18 yrs i love him but u pay 2 play. now he understands b/c he has a little girl that was born while his sentencing ( life sometimes just is crazy) i left from court and saw a new niece. but if you kill and have the capacity for right and wrong unless ur handicapped SEVERELY RETARTED then u kill u die in my book. family or not. flame off/

[Buster]

Ive said it for a long time, I dont see how it is cheaper for the state to allow several appeals on a death sentance while the criminal awaiting his death sits and reads shakespeare getting 3 square meals a day while enjoying his room and roomate till whenever while I have to bust my ass every single day just to make enough to get to work the next day and feed myself. **** that, if this is how the country is going to end up I'll ****ing kill someone lol. Just as long as I get my sexy time visits lol.

[zerioustt]

Originally Posted by cmr076

also it has been proven that death penalty is not a deterrant of any kind (mostly due to the fact that the people that comit these crimes dont have the mental capacity to understand it as a deterrant.)

::edit:: Flame away im bored !

you know why its not a deterrant? because they wait 18817878 years to kill them. as soon as theyre sentenced they should kill them. of course it doesnt scare them when they do one ever 10 years. if they carried through immediately with the execution i gaurantee you it would be a deterrant.

[zerioustt]

Originally Posted by thewake

I honestly feel that those people asking for making the condemned person suffer are looking for vengeance, not justice. Causing unnecessary pain and suffering is torture, and wrong. I would rather have the state seek justice than commit torture. I also think that one of the worst things you could do to a person is lock them in a cage for the rest of their life. If that life is to be ended early then it should be done quickly and quietly.

If the state is to execute the criminals (which is a very rare occurrence), then the state should pick a quick and easy method, and be free to update the method as better ones come along. The executive part of the state should not need a law passed or a court to intervene to change from one method of execution to a different one. Especially if the method is changing one set of injected chemicals to a different set of injected chemicals. The case is about asking the court to force a change in the set of chemicals, most likely the current set is fixed in the statute and can not be changed by the administration even if they wanted to, and thus have to fight in court about which injection is better. It is like fighting over should the death warrant be signed in blue or black ink.

so they commit murder and you want them to drain society further? the taxes that the loved ones get to pay for the scumbag to live who killed their family member?? great idea..make them pay twice for their suffering.

[Spocknasty]

I think a quick death would have to be a very painful death. I bet a lot of people who commit heinous crimes don't care if they die, or want to and lethal injection is a painless way out. I think people who act out for bad should made to feel pain, and have scars left over to convey to the world that they are scum. You steal a man's car? You get some nice long gashes up and down your arm, but we ain't gonna kill you. Everyone's going to know what those scars are though. You think kids would grow up to be crack addicts and thieves if there was a promised amount of pain and visible scaring for life? The world is too pussy anymore, a breeding ground for scum.

/rant.