Turbo-mopar.com GT4 SRT-4 Nurburgring Time Attack! - Page 2 - TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast

9 Ball · 10-04-2006, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

nice times! i have tomorrow off so we'll see what my spec c is capable of

You can probably beat the Evo's time with the Spec C. Before I left the house, I had 5 minutes to kill so I picked the Spec C. I immediately flew by my Evo as soon as I crossed the starting line. It was so fast I wasn't expecting it and then crashed.

I haven't had a chance to give it a real go yet.

**EDIT** I posted the pic of the SRT-4's time at the bottom of page one.

Matt2.8NJ · 10-04-2006, 09:31 PM

6:59.222 !!! Getting there.

Setting this thing up to avoid wheelspin is damn near impossible.

AWD FTW!!

Dave · 10-04-2006, 10:43 PM

tried the spec c, almost there but i need to tune the understeer out. spending toomuch time in the grass ;)

9 Ball · 10-05-2006, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

tried the spec c, almost there but i need to tune the understeer out. spending toomuch time in the grass ;)

You should post our times on the SRT-Forum. Will we get a prize, too?

Dave · 10-05-2006, 09:17 AM

maybe, but do you really want a turbo-mopar.com sticker?

P.S. while there are some srts its more of a omnidaytonashadowlebaronetc forum

OptiCon · 10-05-2006, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

omnidaytonashadowlebaronetc forum

Oh, just ETC, huh?

9 Ball · 10-07-2006, 08:59 AM

O.K. As I suspected, I beat my time in the Evo pretty easily with the Spec C. I ran a 6’31.061. The car can go faster because at one point I was beating that time and then spun out. Suspension settings with this car are critical because it’s initially a very loose car. I was able to iron out the suspension and it handled fairly well.

This car is fast, faster than its horsepower rating and weight would suggest. To test this theory I modified a Z06 to 700hp (naturally aspirated, full weight reduction, the works) and I STILL had a very hard time keeping up with the Spec C. Although the Z06 posted faster lap times, in the first few laps the Spec C left me in the dust. Try it and you’ll see what I mean.

I make a motion to restrict the Spec C from competing with any car in the 4 cylinder category. It’s just too damn fast. If you’re a gambling man you can rob the mess out of some unsuspecting fool in a Spec C in this game.

I’m open to any requests by the way.

Dave · 10-07-2006, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OptiCon

Oh, just ETC, huh?

and yeah grandma mobiles with stupid fast lotus/chrysler bastard motors too

Dave · 10-07-2006, 12:56 PM

the new best from TM's rattlesnake
6.44:296
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/f...340183679b.htm

9 Ball · 10-08-2006, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

the new best from TM's rattlesnake
6.44:296
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/f...340183679b.htm

Pretty quick indeed. Curious as to why he started recording at 3’46.xxx. I would’ve liked to see the run from the beginning.

I guess I can still do more fine-tuning to the car.

9 Ball · 10-08-2006, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt2.8NJ

6:59.222 !!! Getting there.

Setting this thing up to avoid wheelspin is damn near impossible.

AWD FTW!!

Spec C or Evo?

Dave · 10-08-2006, 01:02 PM

i think he got that time in a srt-4. i recently ran a 6'59. then tried a lower downforce/stiffer suspension setup with some wild camber and lost a second

Matt2.8NJ · 10-09-2006, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9 Ball

Spec C or Evo?

SRT-4....remember the title of the thread

I'm below 5:30 in my "Nurburgring" set-up Toyota Minolta. Trying to get into the 5:15 range.

jspek · 10-09-2006, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9 Ball

I make a motion to restrict the Spec C from competing with any car in the 4 cylinder category. It’s just too damn fast. If you’re a gambling man you can rob the mess out of some unsuspecting fool in a Spec C in this game.

I’m open to any requests by the way.

haha yea the only thing that beats the spec c is like full blown le mans cars. i think they screwed up when making the car in the game. nothing can touch it.

9 Ball · 10-10-2006, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspek

haha yea the only thing that beats the spec c is like full blown le mans cars. i think they screwed up when making the car in the game. nothing can touch it.

It was a little outrageous because I was trying to find and even match for the Spec C, however, I had to use more and more sophisticated cars with ridiculous power levels. Finally I said "screw it," and picked the Z06.

The Spec C doesn’t accurately reflect its power level and weight.

Yeah, the designers were a little “off” on this car. But I still love the game.

10-04-2006, 09:31 PM	#22
Matt2.8NJ Tri-State Aficionado Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Central NJ Member #669 iTrader: (0)	6:59.222 !!! Getting there. Setting this thing up to avoid wheelspin is damn near impossible. AWD FTW!! __________________ The MR Edition. BSP #46 V710s, V700s, RA-1s, Advans, MX's, Sumi HTR, and Pirelli 210 for the cold. Quagmire:My fellow Americans, I have not been entirely truthful with you. I did giggittygiggiydoo that girl. I gashmogied her gaflabity with my googus. And I am sorry.

10-07-2006, 08:59 AM	#27
9 Ball Tri-State Post Whore Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Philadelphia PA Member #70 My Ride: 2003 Mitsubishi Evolution VIII iTrader: (0)	O.K. As I suspected, I beat my time in the Evo pretty easily with the Spec C. I ran a 6’31.061. The car can go faster because at one point I was beating that time and then spun out. Suspension settings with this car are critical because it’s initially a very loose car. I was able to iron out the suspension and it handled fairly well. This car is fast, faster than its horsepower rating and weight would suggest. To test this theory I modified a Z06 to 700hp (naturally aspirated, full weight reduction, the works) and I STILL had a very hard time keeping up with the Spec C. Although the Z06 posted faster lap times, in the first few laps the Spec C left me in the dust. Try it and you’ll see what I mean. I make a motion to restrict the Spec C from competing with any car in the 4 cylinder category. It’s just too damn fast. If you’re a gambling man you can rob the mess out of some unsuspecting fool in a Spec C in this game. I’m open to any requests by the way. __________________ 150,000 miles and counting.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Redline Time Attack Day 2	AristoSan	Gallery	2	09-01-2009 11:28 AM
Twins Turbo Time Attack Supra	marshallpre1	Road Racing	10	03-27-2009 03:16 PM
Sweet Time Attack Vid	06evors	Gallery	13	03-20-2008 09:34 PM
Time Attack Impreza L	Renegade_	Gallery	14	09-26-2007 11:58 PM
Lancer Evolution IX Nurburgring Attack!	Silverfc88	Gallery	3	04-24-2005 11:51 PM

10-04-2006, 10:43 PM	#23
Dave Tri-State Post Whore Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cherry hill, NJ Member #633 My Ride: Shelby Z, ZJ, NSX, CBR954RR, Hawk GT iTrader: (0)	tried the spec c, almost there but i need to tune the understeer out. spending toomuch time in the grass ;)

10-05-2006, 09:17 AM	#25
Dave Tri-State Post Whore Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cherry hill, NJ Member #633 My Ride: Shelby Z, ZJ, NSX, CBR954RR, Hawk GT iTrader: (0)	maybe, but do you really want a turbo-mopar.com sticker? P.S. while there are some srts its more of a omnidaytonashadowlebaronetc forum

10-07-2006, 12:56 PM	#29
Dave Tri-State Post Whore Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cherry hill, NJ Member #633 My Ride: Shelby Z, ZJ, NSX, CBR954RR, Hawk GT iTrader: (0)	the new best from TM's rattlesnake 6.44:296 http://videos.streetfire.net/video/f...340183679b.htm

10-08-2006, 01:02 PM	#32
Dave Tri-State Post Whore Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cherry hill, NJ Member #633 My Ride: Shelby Z, ZJ, NSX, CBR954RR, Hawk GT iTrader: (0)	i think he got that time in a srt-4. i recently ran a 6'59. then tried a lower downforce/stiffer suspension setup with some wild camber and lost a second