Car meet for Kony 2012

[Slevin]

Originally Posted by SHOdude

Ive actually known about this for a while now but the day their going to start the serious movement is April 20th and they just released that two days ago, so I figured I'd make the meet after they announced it. I'm not the type to follow trends then forget about them when it is a serious subject. I figured this would be a good way to help out and make somewhat of a difference, so like I stated before if you disagree with the point of the meet or just generally don't care then you aren't forced to come, not directed at you slevin.

i didn't take it personally, and there's nothing wrong about what you're doing. i also didn't direct my post at you as well. spreading awareness is a nice contribution to the cause. i can just understand what "itwillboost" is saying because if you asked half the people that are obsessing about it right now, they won't remember about it a month from now.

Originally Posted by Slevin

no, he doesn't sound anything like that at all. projection much? he sounds like someone who's known about the topic for a while (which we all should) and is annoyed at the people that will make every post on facebook, twitter, etc. for like a week and then forget it ever existed. there's a difference between putting people like that on blast, and mindlessly making fun of people that generally didn't know, but now want to show support.

Originally Posted by Fujito

So he does sound like my example durrr.

Replace "topic" with "band" and it's the same thing. Either way, it all contributes to greater awareness whether or not the people talking about it really care.

you clearly didn't read the second part of my response so i enlarged it for you to read this time around. if you need me to add pop-up pictures to catch your attention i can. (yes, that was a joke. me so funny) part a is what we're talking about. part b is what you're talking about. if boost was acting like someone would in part b, then yes your metaphor would fit correctly. your metaphor was obvious, as there was no need to explain it in detail. the fact you felt the need to is beyond me.

edit: i swapped a and b by accident. view i'm taking is part b. you're analogy isn't similar to my part b, therefore analogy cannot apply.