Quote:
Originally Posted by i like rice
Not a fan boy, just a smart consumer that plans ahead. There is no reason to spend moremoney on a product that is inferior to its competition. It's like going out and buying a Mugen Civic Si and spending $30k-32k when there are better cars for the money. The Civic does the job but the money could be better spent. Is the Sony bodies a bad product? No, there are just better ones out there. You can argue this all you want but you aren't going to win this argument.
|
at this point, we can argue all day as far as price vs. value. you own a Miata? LULZ! there are much better cars for less money. not unlike my Z........could have spent 30 grand and got more car for less. people will buy what they want and when you are talking about SLR cameras, there are some hard facts but with Nikons, Canons and Sonys.......around the same price range, you will get a camera with pretty much the same performance. to claim that a Canon 20D is better than a Sony A-100 would require more proof than "i can pick up a lens at Wawa". sorry bro, but this isn't an argument, it's pretty much subjective. i have met guys with Nikon and Canon rigs where the body alone cost more than my whole setup who can't take a picture worth a crap. again, if you can shoot, a 20D, a D200 or a A-100 will serve you well.
SUBJECTIVE...............PURELY SUBJECTIVE
jim