View Single Post
Old 01-18-2007, 10:44 AM   #6
wrx_snobordr
Tri-State Addict
 
wrx_snobordr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member #21

 
iTrader: (1)
^ I think due to the fact that it isnt patented is interesting. I feel like if the tests are sucessful companies will begin to work on a more effective version. If they can find something and change its compunds enough they can then patent that and make a profit. I would think big pharma is working on this currently so there will be some investment.

However, that statement is sort of misleading. As I understand it if a drug is found to be a "vaccine" then the government will fund it so it can be provided to all who could be affected. I think, if a few congressman/woman champaion the cause, they could get this through under that distinction. While it isnt a "vaccine" it is a cure for an ailment that affects millions. While I would much rather have indusrty handle it as they would be more equipped to alter it for maximum effect, if they are unwilling the gov should step in.
__________________
Stock
wrx_snobordr is offline   Reply With Quote