[grimm]

I have a different view on photography equipment then some i suppose. I bought various non L glass before since it was cheap and i could afford it. I then bought the 70-200 2.8L (i don't think there is a bad review on this lens anywhere) I immediately could see a difference in quality not only in my shots but the build of the lens. I decided then not to waste my $ on a cheaper lenses, just save up and buy the right one from the start. In the end it will save money. I had a hard time selling off the non L glass at 50% less then what i paid for it. I can sell my 70-200 for maybe $200 less then what i paid for it 5 years ago. I mean to each their own, but i'm of the mind set do it right and do it once.

But at any rate, do what you think is best. i'm not saying all cheaper lenses suck but there is a reason why the L's are priced the way it is.