|
I agree with jpalamer.
I control who is hired at my work and given the option of a non-smoker vs a smoker, the non-smoker will get the job every time. The only way I'd hire someone that smokes is if I was extremely desperate to fill a position--and that has never occurred. Besides the health care costs the affect of the odor on co-workers, the reduced productivity/increased agitation from smoke breaks/no-smoking-during-shift are not worth my aggravation.
__________________
Saving for more track time.
|