Quote:
Originally Posted by CleanNeon98
But is it fair to take more money away from those who tried hard to make their 250k a year because some lazy asswipe doesn't care to better themselves? I don't think so. My thought is you are what you make yourself.
The idea of community is good but I don't think the "rich" should be responsible for giving dollars to help the "poor" live better, it gives the "poor" a sense of relaxation where they have no incentive to try and better their lives because they know someone else's tax dollars will pay for that anyway.
You want healthcare? Work for it. You want to live better? Work for it. May sound a bit barbaric to some but I think the government needs to step back a little and let people "fend for themselves".
|
Have you honestly ever met someone / heard of someone making 250k + that fully deserves it? Ones That didnt step on toes to get it? That didnt get LUCKY, that is also paying his workers the salaries they deserve? - the same workers that BUILT the company not just started it? Just like with what happen when the bailouts hit.. CEO's and owners gave themselves huge bonuses and then laid off employees.. this seem fair? I personally dont think it does and I thank god that our Pres. thinks the same way and is trying to do something about it.
I think Companies salaries should be controled by a % (spread the wealth).. If not greedy POS owners / ceo's will continue to keep everyone down for their own gain. If the company is truely profitable then that owner / ceo can make as much as he wants.. but his employees need to be respected and paid for.
Along with this country the government needs reform.. Obama, I feel is trying to do just that. Once he gets the greedy BS people out of his way there is no stoping this country from becoming great once again.