View Single Post
Old 04-07-2009, 06:56 PM   #14389
bl@ckvr4
Tri-State Post Whore
 
bl@ckvr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Member #4236

My Ride:
1992 mitsubishi VR4

iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by motorvated View Post
BTW Art, the car looks good. was just telling someone ive never looked at it in person, just pix. I like the last set you posted a while ago...I think VinnyMac took them? One of you driving around a corner IIRC. The only thing I dont like about the wheels is the absurd weight. But I guess if your making enough power, it doesnt matter
The wheels are indeed heavy, but they actually weigh exactly the same as shock chrome VR4 wheels, so there was really no increase in rotational mass.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyTuscani View Post
that's a dumb statement from him considering ferraris are one of the most aerodynamic cars i've seen especially the F50. i believe most of the later model Ferraris had a CD of less than 0.45. Bet I blew some of your guys mind with that one uh? you guys think i'm all looks and donuts....LOL
Are you sure about that drag coefficient? The reason I'm asking is that the 3000GT drag coefficient is 0.33.
__________________
1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 =:The ecstasy lasts as long as the gasoline:=
1993 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 =:Yes. Another one.:=
1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse RS =:Danger to manifold!:=
1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 =:No, it's not for sale.:=
bl@ckvr4 is offline