|
-The Nikon 70-200 f2.8 IS is a great lens... i was just trying to keep things somewhat affordable. It has image stabilization as well which will help with low light situations. All the bells and whistles. Pro lens.
-The Nikon 80-200 AF-S (which is only available used and can be hard to find) has just as good image quality and focus speed, but it does not have Image Stabilization like the 70-200 does. Pro lens, last generation.
-The Nikon 80-200 AF-D has good image quality but slower focusing. Pro lens (but a bit older). Some have been passed on to the Pro-Ams at this point.
-The Sigma 70-200 has not quite as good image quality (but still good) and has focus speed which is almost as good as the AF-S but better than the AF-D. Pro-Am lens... a great value for the money and still a great lens.
You're looking at the right gear though especially if you plan to continue shooting sports... you will use this lens almost exclusively and will be well worth the purchase, even if they are all a bit expensive. I also use mine for a lot of other work including some portraits, cars, and more.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Quote:
|
If your ever wearing your shirt and someone asks who Mike BartSUki is. Tell them Im a Youtube Sensation and the Top Underground Drifter coming out of Japan! HAHA How JDM is that!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Last edited by TROLL; 10-26-2008 at 04:10 PM.
|