Messing with my XTi: 911 ****pit 2 shots
 

Cant decide which I like more, played with manual focus and im pretty happy with both. shots unedited...C&C?

1.
http://photos-h.ak.facebook.com/phot...24935_1393.jpg

2.
http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/phot...24936_1626.jpg

come on noone has feedback on these??

Def #1 its more of what the driver would be looking at.

Not bad. Other than the reflections on the cluster.

number 1. although, I think the horn symbols make it look like a dirty steering wheel. as redline said, the driver is looking at the cluster more than the porsche symbol. Plus, its still able to be recognized as a porsche symbol in the first pic. I vote number one without the terrible glare. Good pics though.

i like the first better. try a circular polarizer to help get rid of some of those reflections

number 2 is better. now if you were maxing the cars speed out, number 1 would be cool.

my vote goes for no. 2

with the way you have it framed, #1

If you are using it for your job, number one because you can read the odometer and see that the whole display looks functional.

x2
Its a cheap upgrade that will make a huge difference when shooting cars.

agreed get a polorizer. I think it would also be allot stronger if it didnt have that awkward vent on the left

Both would be better if the DOF was shallower.

I think that picking up a 50mm f/1.8 lens wouldn't be a bad idea, it'll teach you the ways of bokeh.

i like one.

the thrifty fifty's bokeh is terrible (pentagonal shape), but most can't complain for $75 (plus it has excessive vignetting wide open, soft until stopped down to f/3.5, loud and slow autofocus motor). Better off saving up for the 50 1.4 or 85 1.8 for a smoother bokeh.

Well, for 75 bucks, you can't beat it.

Agreed though, that the pentagonal bokeh sucks... but the DOF is pretty spectacular.
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...indrops003.jpg

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...indrops004.jpg