TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast

TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast (http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic (http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   Oh North Korea...why must you make me laugh? (http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16528)

Scapegoat 07-05-2006 09:08 AM

Oh North Korea...why must you make me laugh?
 
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

"hey, who thinks its a good idea to test our missiles range by shooting it at the US, raise your hand"

what a maroon :finga:

igo4bmx 07-05-2006 09:18 AM

http://uploads.honda-rally.com//files/1/moran.jpg

Scapegoat 07-05-2006 09:25 AM

that sign is hilarious...rednecks rule!! GO USA!!

wrx_snobordr 07-05-2006 09:55 AM

I saw this on the news....I think this dude is trying to play a little game theory with W. Why would you say ill send an anhilating stirke if they attack us. They hadnt even tested their missle at that point, since it has failed, and if it did work could only reach alaska. I think they forget hat we have icbms that can easily reach them and that W is insane enough to use them.

slavetothemuzic 07-05-2006 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrx_snobordr
I think they forget hat we have icbms that can easily reach them and that W is insane enough to use them.

I think they also forget that we have squadrons of stealth bombers that are nuke capable, and that if we do end up getting into it with NK, we aren't just going to blow one missle off the pad. We'll blow up anything that we have an idea is even remotely connected to the NK nuclear program.

wrx_snobordr 07-05-2006 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slavetothemuzic
I think they also forget that we have squadrons of stealth bombers that are nuke capable, and that if we do end up getting into it with NK, we aren't just going to blow one missle off the pad. We'll blow up anything that we have an idea is even remotely connected to the NK nuclear program.

F the stealth bomber, we now have the f-22 active, thats what it is designed to do. Go into hostile airspace, blwo whatever they have out of the sky, undetected, then blow up **** on the ground, all while going mach 2.

Dave 07-05-2006 11:00 AM

not to mention we're buddy buddy with japan and they are plenty t-eed about this as well

RayArroyo 07-05-2006 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slavetothemuzic
I think they also forget that we have squadrons of stealth bombers that are nuke capable, and that if we do end up getting into it with NK, we aren't just going to blow one missle off the pad. We'll blow up anything that we have an idea is even remotely connected to the NK nuclear program.


i think that we should test our nukes to see if they reach NK

slavetothemuzic 07-05-2006 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrx_snobordr
F the stealth bomber, we now have the f-22 active, thats what it is designed to do. Go into hostile airspace, blwo whatever they have out of the sky, undetected, then blow up **** on the ground, all while going mach 2.

The stealth bombers do have a slightly larger payload however, which would probably be a little better suited for a mission like this.

http://www.darkgovernment.com/b2onrunway.jpeg

http://misheli.image.pbase.com/v3/95...el_4_pbase.jpg

http://www.spacedaily.com/images/plane-b2-bomber-bg.jpg

Scapegoat 07-05-2006 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave
not to mention we're buddy buddy with japan and they are plenty t-eed about this as well

Yes, somehow I dont think Japan likes the idea of shoddy built missiles carrying nuclear warheads flying over head

driftingeric2k4 07-05-2006 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scapegoat
Yes, somehow I dont think Japan likes the idea of shoddy built missiles carrying nuclear warheads flying over head


Japan is just scared that if nukes starting going off in teh sea of Japan that Godzilla will wake up and then Mothra will come down and all **** will break loose :mrgreen:

Silly NK's. They don't have China in their corner on this one...be good and play nice or expect the worse.

wrx_snobordr 07-05-2006 11:30 AM

true, they do have a larger pay load, but they are still a subsonic aircraft with zero defense capabilities. The second the first target is hit there will be enemy jets in the air. Stealth is one thing, but it cant hide from vision. They would either need to send fighter escorts, which are visible on radar or just send a squadron of f-22s. They have the mig-29 and id be wiling to bet a few of the su-37s, the only plan capable of matching the f-22 in manuvering.
http://airpower.callihan.cc/images/p...-formation.jpg

slavetothemuzic 07-05-2006 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrx_snobordr
true, they do have a larger pay load, but they are still a subsonic aircraft with zero defense capabilities. The second the first target is hit there will be enemy jets in the air. Stealth is one thing, but it cant hide from vision. They would either need to send fighter escorts, which are visible on radar or just send a squadron of f-22s. They have the mig-29 and id be wiling to bet a few of the su-37s, the only plan capable of matching the f-22 in manuvering.

Yes, but NK is right on the water. It would take no time at all to be over SK, or the Sea Of Japan, where some FA-18s and F-14s would be waiting for any would be NK war heros.

wrx_snobordr 07-05-2006 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slavetothemuzic
Yes, but NK is right on the water. It would take no time at all to be over SK, or the Sea Of Japan, where some FA-18s and F-14s would be waiting for any would be NK war heros.

F-14 are no longer active. They last squadron is being retired in the beginning of august. They are being given the f-18e. But the f-15 is still the greatest plane in fighter history, until the 22 proves itself so.

Scapegoat 07-05-2006 11:44 AM

the NK's couldn't touch our stealth bombers. You think the commanders would send in a unit of these to attack one target at a time? You better believe multiple targets would be hit at the same time. Most likely including air fields and launch sites.

Somehow, NK fighter planes, or their pilots, don't worry me.

james_ls 07-05-2006 12:23 PM

Woah woah woah I missed something.

They wanna test (nukes) by launching them @ our coasts??

WHAT THE ****!?!

TROLL 07-05-2006 12:28 PM

ha pick up the newspaper james. i was reading about this online last night, its pretty surprising but i dont think its too concerning. i'm mostly concerned that we are going to get our military more heavily involved in another part of the world now which means more soldiers and more money spent there...
and i also wanted to say that i dont know much about capabilities of the planes we use, but that stealth bomber is still one of the most badass looking pieces of machinery in existence.

slavetothemuzic 07-05-2006 12:34 PM

Right now, I don't see our military getting more involved, since we've already stated that we want to seek diplomatic resolution to this.

However, since their leader is Mental Li IL (j/k, it's Kim Jong Il), who knows what that crackpot is likely to do.

wrx_snobordr 07-05-2006 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james_ls
Woah woah woah I missed something.

They wanna test (nukes) by launching them @ our coasts??

WHAT THE ****!?!

NOOOO... they tested 2 short range missles yesterday and attempted to test a long range missle that would be capable of reaching parts of alaska, but that one failed on the launch pad, or we used the airborne laser to shoot it the second the launched it and they cant prove it.

Scapegoat 07-05-2006 12:43 PM

and apparently there is another missile sitting on a launch pad, fueled up, and ready to go. They're saying it is a 2 or 3 stage missile capable of hitting our west coast or farther.

I seriously hope they try something.

That would be a quick "war". Fighting terrorism and trying to liberate a country from a dictator is a whole different league from having nuclear weapons shot at us.

MPowerKai 07-05-2006 06:17 PM

if they are smart they will not send F22's in because they still have a lot of problems and can only be taken airborn for about 30 minutes before they start to get a lot of electrical issues. Yes, this is direct info from a F22 pilot......mmhhhh I wonder if this info is classified??

05Accent 07-05-2006 07:06 PM

oh really? haha yea well the b-2 is badass. i always wonderd the power of the F-22 ever since its production. as for NK. idk wtf they are thinking..

willthethrill 07-05-2006 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scapegoat
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

"hey, who thinks its a good idea to test our missiles range by shooting it at the US, raise your hand"

what a maroon :finga:

damn maroons! :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

slavetothemuzic 07-05-2006 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrx_snobordr
NOOOO... they tested 2 short range missles yesterday and attempted to test a long range missle

The chief of Russia's general staff said that Russian tracking systems showed that Pyongyang may have launched up to 10 missiles during the day.

Most of those being of the short range, SCUD variety.

Drftpretty 07-05-2006 08:07 PM

This morning on the news they were interviewing some fancy pants analyst and the host asked him how real the North Korean nuclear threat was.

This guy laughs, looks at the camera and says "Well we know they have about 6 nuclear war heads. Obviously they cant launch them at us so as long as UPS doesnt accept any delivers from Kim Il Jong we should be safe."

I nearly sh!t while ironing my pants lol

doug 07-05-2006 09:35 PM

I coulda sworn the F-22 wasn't in active service until 2008.. 2010 the latest.

wrx_snobordr 07-05-2006 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MPowerKai
if they are smart they will not send F22's in because they still have a lot of problems and can only be taken airborn for about 30 minutes before they start to get a lot of electrical issues. Yes, this is direct info from a F22 pilot......mmhhhh I wonder if this info is classified??


Ive read that, but from what Ive read they were all early on in development. Alot of the stuff i have read within the last few months have been good. They have done a number of multiple hour flights cross country re-fueling then going into mock dog fights then switching to ground attack. Every one of the flights, containing multiple f-22s has been 7+ hours of flight time and it performed perfectly.

Regardless, every new technology is going to have some kinks to work out. The f-14, when it was brand new, couldnt perform at high angle of attacks because it would stall the engines. They lost a number of them before they replaced the engines in all of them.

antlip 07-05-2006 11:52 PM

their longest missle lasted about 46 seconds and now they have the US sitting alot closer to them with aircraft carriers. if i was NK i dont think i would be testing out 46 second missles aiming at the US.

G1GSX 07-06-2006 12:14 PM

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j2...dewaitwhat.jpg


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.