TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast
Page 3119 of 3501 « First 2119261930193069310931173118 3119 31203121312931693219 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast (http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic (http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   ***TST's Official "Whatever" Thread*** (http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=40740)

the4g63 12-25-2009 10:31 PM
Should I get a remote control plane, or helicopter? I can't decide.

ASIAN JUL 12-25-2009 10:33 PM
http://msbrooks.com/blog/wp-content/...t_take_off.jpg

the4g63 12-25-2009 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603097)
It did.

Erik 12-25-2009 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603095)
Well, Photoshop is often a crutch for people who don't shoot right to begin with. I admit I did it at first for a while, but if you shoot well, most things should not need much editing. It's good for fine tuning or when people do composites or something wild but when it comes to the basics, no one should rely on Photoshop to fix what they don't do right the first time. It irks my soul when I'll tell someone their photo is crooked, underexposed, etc. and their response is "Yeah, I didn't edit at all" or "I'll just fix it in Photoshop." I do use it for things here and there but it really shouldn't be heavily relied on like it is.

On another note, the font used in Nick's TST advertising banner is the same font as my tattoo :eek:
I know exactly what you mean. Like i said, i use lightroom more so than photoshop now. Regardless, same effects are achieved. I hardly edit my work anymore since i feel that i have learned how to achieve the photo without relying on a "crutch." Though, i do find myself needing to tilt my photos to get them straight...i still find myself botching that :\. The most work i do to my photo is bumping contrast, vinuette (sp?), and maybe saturation if the photo calls for it. Occasionally i use the spot correction or dust correction for certain photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by the4g63 (Post 1603096)
Should I get a remote control plane, or helicopter? I can't decide.
helicopter hands down. haha

russiankid 12-25-2009 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the4g63 (Post 1603096)
Should I get a remote control plane, or helicopter? I can't decide.
If you want to buy many parts, buy a helicopter. If you want to spend more time in the air and having fun, then buy a plane.

sleeper15 12-25-2009 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603095)
Well, Photoshop is often a crutch for people who don't shoot right to begin with. I admit I did it at first for a while, but if you shoot well, most things should not need much editing. It's good for fine tuning or when people do composites or something wild but when it comes to the basics, no one should rely on Photoshop to fix what they don't do right the first time. It irks my soul when I'll tell someone their photo is crooked, underexposed, etc. and their response is "Yeah, I didn't edit at all" or "I'll just fix it in Photoshop." I do use it for things here and there but it really shouldn't be heavily relied on like it is.

On another note, the font used in Nick's TST advertising banner is the same font as my tattoo :eek:
yeah, i've gotten a whole lot better about the whole under-over exposed part now. i mainly used it now for color corrections, or if i want to get a little "artsy" with the pics i take.

and, you got a new tattoo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by the4g63 (Post 1603096)
Should I get a remote control plane, or helicopter? I can't decide.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the4g63 (Post 1603098)
It did.
yup, mythbusters proved it. :lol:

ASIAN JUL 12-25-2009 10:40 PM
Erik, do you like having super dark photos? That is a serious question, I'm not trying to be rude.

ASIAN JUL 12-25-2009 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleeper15 (Post 1603102)
yeah, i've gotten a whole lot better about the whole under-over exposed part now. i mainly used it now for color corrections, or if i want to get a little "artsy" with the pics i take.

and, you got a new tattoo?





yup, mythbusters proved it. :lol:


No, I've had this tattoo for 3 years

the4g63 12-25-2009 10:43 PM
Hello there, Jul.

ASIAN JUL 12-25-2009 10:44 PM
hai Jack

sleeper15 12-25-2009 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603103)
Erik, do you like having super dark photos? That is a serious question, I'm not trying to be rude.
you know, my cousin asked me that about some of my photo's i've taken at car shows. he asked "do you like that under exposed look?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603104)
No, I've had this tattoo for 3 years
oooohh, ok.

Erik 12-25-2009 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603103)
Erik, do you like having super dark photos? That is a serious question, I'm not trying to be rude.
yes. i know you hate it, but i underexpose everything. Some people (like you :p) hate it. Others understand its my "style."

I know how to properly expose an image when its needed, for example, when shooting for a client in regards to an ad of somesort. If im shooting to emphasize my own personality and technique, it will be more likely underexposed. If i show a series of properly exposed photos and one is underexposed its wrong. If my statement in regards to my series does not mention heavy contrast or anything relating to that, than an underexposed photo is wrong.

the4g63 12-25-2009 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603107)
hai Jack
GTF over here. Please. Or answer BBM.

ASIAN JUL 12-25-2009 10:50 PM
Meh, I should probably stop before I get too into this conversation lol

ASIAN JUL 12-25-2009 10:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the4g63 (Post 1603112)
GTF over here. Please. Or answer BBM.
:banned:

Don't know where my phone is and I'm running low on you know whatties... but I gueeeeessss I could come over there. You think McDonald's is open?

Erik 12-25-2009 10:52 PM
haha hater. i know exactly which photo you hate the most of mine. lol next portrait shoot ill do, ill purposely....../cringe properly expose....everything hahha

Erik 12-25-2009 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603114)
:banned:

Don't know where my phone is and I'm running low on you know whatties... but I gueeeeessss I could come over there. You think McDonald's is open?
:eek:

sleeper15 12-25-2009 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik (Post 1603109)
yes. i know you hate it, but i underexpose everything. Some people (like you :p) hate it. Others understand its my "style."

I know how to properly expose an image when its needed, for example, when shooting for a client in regards to an ad of somesort. If im shooting to emphasize my own personality and technique, it will be more likely underexposed. If i show a series of properly exposed photos and one is underexposed its wrong. If my statement in regards to my series does not mention heavy contrast or anything relating to that, than an underexposed photo is wrong.
yeah, i kinda have a weird "shoot into the sun" thing i do with cars.

http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos..._6899801_n.jpg

http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos..._8068160_n.jpg

http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos..._1551387_n.jpg

http://photos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos..._8322183_n.jpg

the4g63 12-25-2009 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603114)
:banned:

Don't know where my phone is and I'm running low on you know whatties... but I gueeeeessss I could come over there. You think McDonald's is open?
Lul. McDonalds was closed earlier.

sleeper15 12-25-2009 10:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIAN JUL (Post 1603113)
Meh, I should probably stop before I get too into this conversation lol
:roll:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.
Page 3119 of 3501 « First 2119261930193069310931173118 3119 31203121312931693219 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.