![]() |
Quote:
Next time dont pay for the extra shipping. They usually ship things out in a day or two at the most. Living in Jersey is sweet, my 70-200 was ordered on a Wed, and on Thurs the lens was at my door. Edit** Damnit Grimm beat me to it, thats what I get for not reading the rest of the thread. Chris |
Quote:
I got this one http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...12_Tripod.html I don't know much about tripods, so I didn't want to spend a lot of money on one. This one seems like it will get the job done for whatever I do. |
Quote:
|
i want to sell my nikon 12-24 and buy a 70-200 f/4 and a 10-22.
or a 17-40 and a film slr. or if i was rich a 14mm and a 5D or if i was a disgustingly rich a linhof technorama 617 http://www.linhof.de/images/T617_neu.jpg |
All my stuff just came. 24 hours wow haha.
|
I'm thinking about a 28 f/1.8... anybody have any experience with it?
|
should be nice on a crop sensor
|
I'm full frame - I need something wider for parties & things that a 50 will just be too long. Problem is some are saying it's pretty soft. I don't have the cash for a 24 1.4L :(
|
24 is widde on FF
35/2 is real nice lens for the money There's also the Sigma 30/1.4 which is supposedly real good too |
ive been wanting to try out the 30 1.4 for a while. but i lust after the nikon 28 1.4, i just dont feel like selling my soul and searching the globe for one.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i just bought a Sigma 12-24 for FX, so I will post my thoughts when I get it |
Quote:
I've heard decent things about the 28/1.8 but have never used it. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Just got my sigma 12-24 today! check the random photo thread for examples!
|
The widest thing I currently have for my D700 is my 24-70... and its a totally badass lens that gets most of what I need done.
Still, I want a wider option, just for those rare occasions. Don't want anything thats obscenely expensive or heavy, and I don't need 2.8, but I do want image quality. Narrowed it down to the Nikon 18-35 f3.5-4.5 and the Sigma 15-30 f3.5-4.5. Nikon is slightly more expensive, smaller, lighter, and can take front filters. The Sigma obviously goes to 15mm which could be a lot of fun, although unnecessary. Reviews say both have overall good image quality, but both are a bit soft at the corners. Hrrmmmm. |
Personal favorite of mine from Canon is the 50 1.8
For the money, you just can't beat it. If I could afford it, I would go for L-glass but when I had my old setup, I found myself using the 50mm more than my 70-200L, not just because of focal length but because I paid 100 for the 50 brand new and could get crazy DOF with it. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.