| RichK |
10-01-2008 06:21 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cszakolczai
(Post 1060852)
Ah... thank god you chimed in... I can ask you about the lens now, do you really think the VR is worth it? Or just get the 80-200 AFS? I already have the money for the 70-200VR so its not like I'm still in the saving up process, I just loved VR with my 18-200 and thouhght that for a little extra money I might as well have gotten the top of the line lens. I've heard the optics are pretty much the same for the 2, but the 70-200VR was just a little better.
|
If you have had a lens with VR, then you know it doesn't help stopping action with slower shutter speeds. However, it will allow you to shoot at say, 1/60th of a second at 200mm hand held. Whereas with the 80-200, your shots may be soft due to hand shake at the same shutter speed. Today for instance, I loved having the VR. I was shooting an indoor dog show and I needed to take "title shots" with the handlers, dogs, judges, ribbons, etc. The light was poor and in order to get good DOF, I needed to shoot slower shutter speeds. The VR was very handy in that situation.
However, when light is good, and you are shooting at say 1/500th or faster, VR really doesn't do too much IMO unless your hands shake like crazy. One other thing, IMO, the 80-200 feels better in the hands. The barrel is the same diameter the length of the lens and just feels better. If you want the "best", then definitely go for the 70-200. It won't disappoint you.
|