11-14-2007, 06:24 PM | #1 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Discuss Gun Laws (..in light of recent events)
"THERE SHOULD BE A LAW WHERE YOU GET 20 YEARS FOR SHOOTING AT A COP." Now honestly, as a society, where the **** did we go wrong???? Why would they even try passing a law where shooting at an officer gets you 20 years automatically, but murdering someone in cold blood gets you 6, out in 2 years. It's the most screwed up logic that I have ever heard. So now we will have maybe 2 less police shootings in Philly (because they are shooting at the police to kill them, they don't care about prison sentence anyway) , and there will still be 250 murders by shooting each year, because everyone knows that they will be out in a couple years anyway if caught. Why would they not make the law 20 years for shooting at ANYONE (unless, obviously, self defense)?? IF they passed a law where it was a min. of 20 years for shooting at someone, there would probably be 1/3 of the murders there are right now. I know that's not perfect, but it is quite the improvement. So here are my proposed laws to go along with gun laws...I'll list the gun laws first... You have 72 hours to report a stolen firearm. If done so past the deadline, you have just committed a felony (unless circumstances such as vacation). If someone doesn't report a firearm stolen, they are either nuts or stupid. Either way, the felony means that they won't be purchasing any more guns. I know that if any of my guns were stolen, the first thing I would do is report them. It's literally stupid to not report it, as your gun can now be used in a crime. It's got your prints all over it, and possibly a paper trail ;) . If a gun is stolen from your property, and it was not locked up, you have just committed a felony. You lose your guns and lose the right to buy them in the future, because you are too stupid to own one in the first place. If you buy a firearm for someone who can not legally purchase a firearm, you get 5 years in prison, fines, and also have just committed a felony. This means, no more straw purchases for you. That's all for the gun laws. No reduced sentences. No probation. Just the min. required jail time. Prosecutors, feel free to tack on more time. Now for laws that go along with guns.... 20 years min. for shooting at ANYONE (NOT JUST A COP, THAT'S RETARDED). 20 years min. means 20 years min. Not a day less. Life/death sentence if you kill someone. That's life/death sentence, not 2 years and parole. Not 6 years. Not 88 years. It's your life, whether it's stuck in the jail cell, or burning in hell. Now I know people are going to stress over the lax. gun laws, and wanted to make a preemptive thread. The guns laws are NOT lax. The gun laws are strict, and on paper, carved in stone (theoretically). The laws that go along with crimes committed with guns are strict laws. The problem is, they are not enforced. You can add all of the laws that you want, but if at the end of the day, you give some savage 2 years for murdering a poor kid caught in the crossfire, people are going to continue to kill others. If you listened to the reports, 85% of the shootings were committed by felons. This means that 85% of the shootings happened with people who did not legally purchase guns. Making more gun control laws will do nothing. Enforcing the current laws, and making them stricter will do something (well, more than just writing more laws down on paper). I have also heard that people can only buy 1 gun per month. That's 12 guns per year. I know people who buy about 15 guns per year, and haven't shot at anyone, nor do they give their guns away. It's a retarded law, that will only effect true hobbyists. I would like to see statistics/numbers/records of people with "straw purchases" that buy this many guns/year. Your thoughts and what should be gun laws and what should not? |
11-14-2007, 06:47 PM | #2 |
Tri-State Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Aston
Member #3422
My Ride: 07 Legacy 06 Mazda5 96 Dakota 78 Firebird 03 Kawasaki iTrader: (2)
|
I don't own a gun and probably never will....but i think there should be paperwork like a title and regulations but definately no bans...then the only ones with guns would be the criminals. LOL I love it when they want to make it all this time for shooting at a cop...shouldn't matter... a life is a life whether its a cop or other person and should be punished accordingly. 20 years from now we will have no freedoms in this country.
__________________
07 Legacy 06 Mazda5 96 Dakota 78 Firebird 03 Kawasaki To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
11-14-2007, 06:49 PM | #3 |
Tri-State Post Whore
Banned
|
im almost positive in nj if u have a gun stolen from ur house u get in trouble for not keepin it locked up, or something
if 85 percent of murders are by felons, that means gun laws shouldnt change, that way more good guys have guns, to stop the bad guys. if guns are illegal only the bad guys will have them, leaving the good guys defenseless edit- there is paperwork and background checks for all handguns. rifles and shotguns are less strict, but most criminals dont bother with rifles and such. |
11-14-2007, 06:51 PM | #4 | |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
i completely agree with you on all points!
we need to put the fear of god into these scumbags shooting people. its absolutely rediculous that killing a cop should land you more jail time than any other human being. throw them in jail and lock away the key, society as a whole would be better off. they need to give them weapons in prison so they can off one another to bring down the prison population.
__________________
91 300zxtt, 2 07 honda fits, 08 kawasaki MS/SE, 07 yamaha yfz 450 se your mom has no thumbs and hitch hikes like this... Quote:
|
|
11-14-2007, 07:09 PM | #5 |
TST Ruined My Life!
|
i have a question about your locked up gun law..say your gun got stolen from your house and your house was locked. does that count? thats private property where the firearm is technichally "locked". if its hidden somewhere in your house thats locked would that count? or are you talking strictly of a gun safe? i dont mean to ruffle any feathers, im just curious because these questions will most certainly be raised.
I personally do not own a gun so I'm not exactly sure what the perameters are to obtaining a weapon legally, but it doesnt seem too hard to do. that said, im not sure how they would make it any harder. ie, they already perform background checks correct? along with a valid license, birth certificate, etc. My opinion is that most of the gun crime occurs when weapons are obtained illegally. if there was a way to prevent this then the solution would be much easier but unfortunately i dont think there is a surefire way to keep guns from being bought and sold illegally.
__________________
FOR SALE! Canon 5D|17-40L|85mm f/1.8|Sigmalux|580ex
|
11-14-2007, 07:26 PM | #6 |
TST Ruined My Life!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where do you live?
Member #532
My Ride: Fly Mosca II w/pegs LOLZ iTrader: (7)
|
all of the above should be real laws, by all means. If your stupid enough to kill someone in anyway other then self defense you should be doing 20 to life if not take the death penalty.
/end |
11-14-2007, 07:33 PM | #7 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
I would say that teh gun should have to be in your home, your home locked, and the gun not in plain sight. IE : in some form of cabinet or chest. I also dont think mandatory trigger/chamber locks are a bad idea, they're not terribly hard to remove but atlast its time consuming.
|
11-14-2007, 07:39 PM | #8 |
Tri-State Addict
|
The only thing I do not agree with is the lock up law. If I purchase a gun and want to leave it on my kitchen table that is my right. I should not have my rights limited because some criminal might break into my house. He is the criminal, not me.
Everything else I agree with but I would take them further. Prison would cease to be a resort compared to the days of old. I would make jails like the Jail in Arizona, tent cities. There would no longer be stores where criminals could buy outside goods. 3 meals a day, no tv, no magazines...nothing. I would allow a library and a GED program to allow those who wish to improve their lives to do so.
__________________
Stock |
11-14-2007, 07:43 PM | #9 |
Tri-State Post Whore
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Richboro
Member #543
My Ride: '68 Kaiser M715/ '37 Ford truck/'47 Dodge truck iTrader: (0)
|
More laws won't do a thing. Also, it should never be mandatory to lock a gun in your own home. If someone breaks into my place, I sure don't want to be fumbling with some lock before I can blow the intruders head off.
__________________
2012 Honda Accord Touring 1968 Kaiser M715 FrankenJeep 1947 Dodge 1.5 Ton Resto-mod 1937 Ford pick-up 1950 Crosley Farm-o-Road |
11-14-2007, 07:49 PM | #10 | |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Amen, adding gun laws won't do ****.
__________________
Champ White 1996 Civic Hatch - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. Quote:
|
|
11-14-2007, 08:12 PM | #11 |
TST Ruined My Life!
|
i agree with wrx_snowbrdr that maybe gun laws arent the problem and our jail systems are too lax. i think inmates have too many privileges and would be right along side when they decided to eliminate any luxuries. tv, entertainment, etc. start with jail and maybe gun crime will diminish
__________________
FOR SALE! Canon 5D|17-40L|85mm f/1.8|Sigmalux|580ex
|
11-14-2007, 08:51 PM | #12 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
poolmike and 97turbo, when I refer to locking up the gun, I mean locking up the gun.
A sufficient effort is locking up your home, and not putting them in plain view, OR, locking them up in a safe or room. I carry a gun (CCW), and I sleep with a gun next to me (not locked up). BUT, when I am not carrying, or sleeping, my guns are always locked up. I go up to bed, unlock the safe, switch my carry gun to my home defense gun, and go to bed. When I wake up in the morning, I switch guns again, lock the safe, and I'm on my way. I don't think that guns should be left out in the open, in plain view, unattended, however, it is the homeowners right. Therefore, as stated, locking your home, while is seems sufficient, isn't. Locking your home with guns out of site of windows, in a closet, in a gun safe, hidden somewhere, etc., is sufficient. In the end, I agree that it would be a hard law to make. Honestly, I don't know how I would word it. It's sounding like a worse and worse idea, though I'll continue to do it anyway. EDIT: Dragonfly, well said! GPZJACK, The problem with registrations are really simple. If you look (factually) at other countries with gun registration laws, as a measure of gun control, within the decade, stricter laws were passed and all registered guns were collected and destroyed by the government, that is, all registered, LEGAL guns. The other problem with this is that it will not help to control violence, at all. Like I said, 85% of murders happen with illegal firearms. Registration would do nothing to lower the rates. And about prison being to "easy". Some of those maximum security prisons are like country clubs compared to how the people are used to living! I agree completely! |
11-15-2007, 12:33 AM | #13 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
I don't see how strict gun penalities would help the current problem. I think we should put more focus on preventing the crime, not worrying about what we should do after a crime has been committed. If criminals were worried about penalties, no one would commit murder anymore. Murder has had the same penalty for hundreds of years. It's either the death penalty or life in prison, and yet murder hasn't stopped.
Building "tent city" creates a problem, because everybody forgets about "the other inmates". "The other inmates" are what correctional officers are called. If you put inmates in 100 degree weather, you are putting the CO's there too. And for anybody who thinks prison is a country club, your wrong. I used to think the sameway, until I went to one. Their's nothing fun about prison, it's no country club, it's not a resort. It's hell, with a little food. |
11-15-2007, 01:00 AM | #14 |
TST Ruined My Life!
|
and yet prisons are still overcrowded. if they were so bad, people would be doing whatever they could to stay out of them yet we are running out of prison space. that is neither here nor there since this is the gun law discussion thread but i wanted to voice my opinion on that matter. now back on topic.
__________________
FOR SALE! Canon 5D|17-40L|85mm f/1.8|Sigmalux|580ex
|
11-15-2007, 01:02 AM | #15 | |
Tri-State Addict
|
Quote:
You say what about the CO, what about them? If we take away all the amenities for the prisoners that we are wasting money on I would have no problem increasing the pay to the CO's for making their job a bit hotter. I am sure they would be happy with a nice pay raise. You can't focus on one issue. You need to focus on the whole picture. Better education of our youth, strictly enforcing the laws on the books, toughening up the prisons, just because some hard criminals do not think about the consequences other petty criminals do and this would make them think just a little bit harder.
__________________
Stock |
|
11-15-2007, 01:39 AM | #17 |
TST Ruined My Life!
|
Any kind of first degree murder is a class 1 felony and is punishable by death or life imprisonment. In Arizona, the trial jury decides whether the defendant has committed first degree murder. Then the judge holds a separate sentencing hearing to determine the proper sentence. A.R.S. § 13-703 outlines the various 'aggravating' and 'mitigating' factors that the judge must consider in reaching a decision about whether to impose the death penalty.
http://www.lawforkids.org/speakup/vi...ion.cfm?id=309
__________________
FOR SALE! Canon 5D|17-40L|85mm f/1.8|Sigmalux|580ex
Last edited by 97TurboDSM; 11-15-2007 at 01:41 AM. |
11-15-2007, 01:46 AM | #18 |
Tri-State Addict
|
if you are over 21 you should be required to own a gun, in my opinion.
__________________
2008 MAZDASPEED 3 - COBB SRI, CS INSERTS /// 14.2@104 FWD FTL To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. 2000 VSM CIVIC COUPE To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. stolen To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. CANON |
11-15-2007, 03:44 AM | #19 | |
Tri-State Addict
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
11-15-2007, 08:53 AM | #20 | |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blktopsil80's Never Ending 240sx build: UPDATE: New pics from recent events | BLKtopSIL80 | Member Journals | 23 | 07-13-2009 02:52 PM |
What are the PA Amber light laws? | Infa-red SVT | Ask The Law | 1 | 03-05-2009 12:37 AM |
nightshaded tail light laws in pa | soCo | Ask The Law | 1 | 04-25-2008 12:31 AM |
Sound system laws and underglow laws. | Drowsy | Ask The Law | 2 | 12-13-2007 03:25 PM |
NJ Headlight/Tail Light Laws | jrbouncer06 | Ask The Law | 1 | 03-15-2007 01:37 AM |