09-07-2009, 06:22 PM | #1 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Lens Discussion...
Feel free to make this a place to discuss different lenses and post example photos! With that being said, does anyone have the Nikon 300mm f4? I am thinking about picking one up...
__________________
Live with Passion. |
09-07-2009, 11:45 PM | #3 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
They have one used at Le Camera in Princeton. Juss sayin.
I just picked up a Vivitar Series 1 85mm f1.4 (also goes by Polar, Samyang, Rokinon, etc) that I was going to post a new thread about but I'll just throw my thoughts in here when I dump the memory card. From what I can tell so far this is the most impressive $350 lens around.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:25 AM | #4 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Go for the 200/2
Can't decide between the 50/1.2 or 45TS-E for next lens Probably rent the 45 and see how I like it
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 02:17 AM | #6 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
I love my 70-200 f/2.8L.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 10:49 AM | #7 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
I want too many damn things lol. I want to start getting into using my sb-600 off camera. I am going to buy some cheap ebay triggers to start off with. And there is a few lenses that i am really want right now.
Nikon 35mm f1.8- I am still waiting for B&H or Adorama to get it in stock Sigma 10-20mm Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 Sigma 150mm Macro lens |
09-08-2009, 10:55 AM | #8 | ||
Tri-State Post Whore
|
I <3 my Canon 50 1.4.... otherwise I only have my kit lens. *cries in the corner*
__________________
[ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. ] Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-08-2009, 11:34 AM | #9 |
Tri-State Addict
|
I want a new body over the past couple of shows I shot with a Tokina 12-24 and it wasnt bad at all. I just hate having to be on top of people or cars when I shoot. My next lens purchase will probably be the Tamron 17-50
|
09-08-2009, 11:40 AM | #10 | |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Quote:
I'd like to get a 24TS-E or some fast wide primes
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
|
09-08-2009, 11:56 AM | #11 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
I have the 17-40 f/4L and while it's a great lens, I do plan on going to the 16-35 f/2.8L at some point.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:08 PM | #12 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
off hand why?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:13 PM | #13 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
If I would guess, because its wider, faster, and sharper? lol
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:16 PM | #14 |
Tri-State Post Whore
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montgomeryville, PA
Member #4286
My Ride: old BMW & obnoxious bike(s) iTrader: (5)
|
i just want a 30mm 1.4.
__________________
// To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:32 PM | #15 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
I can't complain about the sharpness of my 17-40, and 1mm wider isn't a whole big a deal to me, but the 2.8 is really the attraction.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:37 PM | #16 |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
well thats why i asked, it is slightly wider, but it definitely isn't sharper, it is not as clear around the edges of the frame and produces more CA then the 17-40, it is a 2.8, but i'm not sure how useful that would be on that wide of a lens. All that for $1300 just seems like an awfully expensive purchase only to gain a few steps, and loose clarity over the $700 17-40L or even the dis-continued 17-35 2.8L ?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
09-08-2009, 12:42 PM | #17 |
Tri-State Aficionado
|
I don't think it'd replace the 17-40, because your correct about there not really needing the 2.8 especially with landscape photography which is where I use this mainly. Not to mention I have a 77mm B+W Kaesemann CP filter that I use on both my 70-200 and 17-40 that wouldn't fit on the 16-35.
But I do truly love that 17-40. It is by far the lens I use the most but then again I do a lot of landscape. Time for a sample shot:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. Last edited by Supersprynt; 09-08-2009 at 12:45 PM. |
09-08-2009, 01:00 PM | #18 | |
Tri-State Post Whore
|
Quote:
What camera body are you using? Anything but the D40/50/60 and D2/3 series can command the SB600 off of the camera. But yeah, the ebay radio triggers are really cheap and decent.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
|
09-08-2009, 06:53 PM | #20 |
Tri-State Addict
|
I had the 300/4 non-AF-S version. It was a nice lens for the money. A little slow to focus, but nice and sharp, even wide open. The AF-S version focuses much faster, so I would recommend that. I sold my 300/4 to get my 300/2.8, one of Nikon's best IMO.
__________________
A few Nikon bodies and lenses To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8thcivic evo discussion lol | jcr557 | Off-Topic | 6 | 12-28-2008 05:57 PM |
Vascar Discussion | Keeper1343 | General Car Related Chat | 39 | 01-13-2008 01:15 AM |
DISCUSSION about rice, NO FIGHTS | GLHWCU | Off-Topic | 111 | 12-28-2007 10:48 PM |
TT Impreza that was F/S for discussion | SilverTurboRidin | Off-Topic | 6 | 01-14-2006 08:35 PM |