TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast  

Go Back TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast > Community > Gallery > Photography
Register Rules & Info

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2009, 06:22 PM   #1
djb5118
Tri-State Post Whore
 
djb5118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Member #5884

My Ride:
SC300

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to djb5118
Lens Discussion...

So I haven't seen a thread in here yet with the sole purpose of discussing glass.

Feel free to make this a place to discuss different lenses and post example photos!





With that being said, does anyone have the Nikon 300mm f4? I am thinking about picking one up...
__________________
Live with Passion.
djb5118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 07:57 PM   #2
BlackTypeR
Tri-State Post Whore
 
BlackTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Member #459

 
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BlackTypeR
I want a 200 1.8
That's all
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
BlackTypeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 11:45 PM   #3
sisforsurfing
Tri-State Post Whore
 
sisforsurfing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member #267

My Ride:
2003 WRX wagon

iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to sisforsurfing
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackTypeR View Post
I want a 200 1.8
That's all
They have one used at Le Camera in Princeton. Juss sayin.

I just picked up a Vivitar Series 1 85mm f1.4 (also goes by Polar, Samyang, Rokinon, etc) that I was going to post a new thread about but I'll just throw my thoughts in here when I dump the memory card. From what I can tell so far this is the most impressive $350 lens around.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
sisforsurfing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:25 AM   #4
Chris_PA
Tri-State Post Whore
 
Chris_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West Chester
Member #1541

My Ride:
02 Exploder

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Chris_PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackTypeR View Post
I want a 200 1.8
That's all
Go for the 200/2



Can't decide between the 50/1.2 or 45TS-E for next lens
Probably rent the 45 and see how I like it
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Chris_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:35 AM   #5
Fujito
Tri-State Post Whore
 
Fujito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Member #10571

My Ride:
Toyota Celica

iTrader: (0)
I want the Canon 70-200mm 2.8 L

but the ARC intercooler costs just as much. I guess the lens will have to wait.
Fujito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 02:17 AM   #6
Supersprynt
Tri-State Aficionado
 
Supersprynt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT
Member #1000

My Ride:
2006 Mazdaspeed 6

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Supersprynt
I love my 70-200 f/2.8L.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Supersprynt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 10:49 AM   #7
Blue_gsx23
Tri-State Aficionado
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Member #8278

 
iTrader: (1)
I want too many damn things lol. I want to start getting into using my sb-600 off camera. I am going to buy some cheap ebay triggers to start off with. And there is a few lenses that i am really want right now.

Nikon 35mm f1.8- I am still waiting for B&H or Adorama to get it in stock
Sigma 10-20mm
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8
Sigma 150mm Macro lens
Blue_gsx23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 10:55 AM   #8
ASIAN JUL
Tri-State Post Whore
 
ASIAN JUL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: DelCo ;]
Member #9030

My Ride:
'95 Integra LS hatch

iTrader: (1)
I <3 my Canon 50 1.4.... otherwise I only have my kit lens. *cries in the corner*
__________________
[
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
]

Quote:
It was the sexual guardian angel saying sir your stroke is on point, go forth and conquer
ASIAN JUL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 11:34 AM   #9
AristoSan
Tri-State Addict
 
AristoSan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jerz
Member #10650

My Ride:
Boosted 2001 GS300

iTrader: (0)
I want a new body over the past couple of shows I shot with a Tokina 12-24 and it wasnt bad at all. I just hate having to be on top of people or cars when I shoot. My next lens purchase will probably be the Tamron 17-50
AristoSan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 11:40 AM   #10
grimm
Tri-State Post Whore
 
grimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Member #3058

 
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to grimm
Quote:
Originally Posted by AristoSan View Post
I want a new body over the past couple of shows I shot with a Tokina 12-24 and it wasnt bad at all. I just hate having to be on top of people or cars when I shoot. My next lens purchase will probably be the Tamron 17-50
why not the canon 17-40F4L? it's a fantastic lens, very sharp, but a little slow. and you can find one used for like $700 which is cheap for L glass.

I'd like to get a 24TS-E or some fast wide primes
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
grimm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 11:56 AM   #11
Supersprynt
Tri-State Aficionado
 
Supersprynt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT
Member #1000

My Ride:
2006 Mazdaspeed 6

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Supersprynt
I have the 17-40 f/4L and while it's a great lens, I do plan on going to the 16-35 f/2.8L at some point.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Supersprynt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:08 PM   #12
grimm
Tri-State Post Whore
 
grimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Member #3058

 
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to grimm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supersprynt View Post
I have the 17-40 f/4L and while it's a great lens, I do plan on going to the 16-35 f/2.8L at some point.
off hand why?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
grimm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:13 PM   #13
JhnRX7
Tri-State Aficionado
 
JhnRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Member #10944

My Ride:
'83 Datsun 280zx, '94 Mazda RX-7

iTrader: (0)
If I would guess, because its wider, faster, and sharper? lol
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
JhnRX7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:16 PM   #14
justinlansdale
Tri-State Post Whore
 
justinlansdale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montgomeryville, PA
Member #4286

My Ride:
old BMW & obnoxious bike(s)

iTrader: (5)
Send a message via AIM to justinlansdale
i just want a 30mm 1.4.
__________________

//
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
justinlansdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:32 PM   #15
Supersprynt
Tri-State Aficionado
 
Supersprynt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT
Member #1000

My Ride:
2006 Mazdaspeed 6

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Supersprynt
Quote:
Originally Posted by JhnRX7 View Post
If I would guess, because its wider, faster, and sharper? lol
I can't complain about the sharpness of my 17-40, and 1mm wider isn't a whole big a deal to me, but the 2.8 is really the attraction.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Supersprynt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:37 PM   #16
grimm
Tri-State Post Whore
 
grimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Member #3058

 
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to grimm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JhnRX7 View Post
If I would guess, because its wider, faster, and sharper? lol
well thats why i asked, it is slightly wider, but it definitely isn't sharper, it is not as clear around the edges of the frame and produces more CA then the 17-40, it is a 2.8, but i'm not sure how useful that would be on that wide of a lens. All that for $1300 just seems like an awfully expensive purchase only to gain a few steps, and loose clarity over the $700 17-40L or even the dis-continued 17-35 2.8L ?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
grimm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:42 PM   #17
Supersprynt
Tri-State Aficionado
 
Supersprynt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT
Member #1000

My Ride:
2006 Mazdaspeed 6

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Supersprynt
I don't think it'd replace the 17-40, because your correct about there not really needing the 2.8 especially with landscape photography which is where I use this mainly. Not to mention I have a 77mm B+W Kaesemann CP filter that I use on both my 70-200 and 17-40 that wouldn't fit on the 16-35.

But I do truly love that 17-40. It is by far the lens I use the most but then again I do a lot of landscape. Time for a sample shot:

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by Supersprynt; 09-08-2009 at 12:45 PM.
Supersprynt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 01:00 PM   #18
sisforsurfing
Tri-State Post Whore
 
sisforsurfing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member #267

My Ride:
2003 WRX wagon

iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to sisforsurfing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_PA View Post
Can't decide between the 50/1.2 or 45TS-E for next lens
Probably rent the 45 and see how I like it
I'd be really interested to see what you'd do with the 45... would give a certain look to some of your work. Lots of the fashion/portrait shooters do great stuff with the 50 though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_gsx23 View Post
I want too many damn things lol. I want to start getting into using my sb-600 off camera.
What camera body are you using? Anything but the D40/50/60 and D2/3 series can command the SB600 off of the camera. But yeah, the ebay radio triggers are really cheap and decent.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
sisforsurfing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 01:21 PM   #19
djb5118
Tri-State Post Whore
 
djb5118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Member #5884

My Ride:
SC300

iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to djb5118
I want a Sigma 12-24 too...that lens is SICK on FX!
__________________
Live with Passion.
djb5118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 06:53 PM   #20
RichK
Tri-State Addict
 
RichK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Member #5379

 
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by djb5118 View Post
So I haven't seen a thread in here yet with the sole purpose of discussing glass.

Feel free to make this a place to discuss different lenses and post example photos!





With that being said, does anyone have the Nikon 300mm f4? I am thinking about picking one up...
I had the 300/4 non-AF-S version. It was a nice lens for the money. A little slow to focus, but nice and sharp, even wide open. The AF-S version focuses much faster, so I would recommend that. I sold my 300/4 to get my 300/2.8, one of Nikon's best IMO.
__________________
A few Nikon bodies and lenses


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
RichK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8thcivic evo discussion lol jcr557 Off-Topic 6 12-28-2008 05:57 PM
Vascar Discussion Keeper1343 General Car Related Chat 39 01-13-2008 01:15 AM
DISCUSSION about rice, NO FIGHTS GLHWCU Off-Topic 111 12-28-2007 10:48 PM
TT Impreza that was F/S for discussion SilverTurboRidin Off-Topic 6 01-14-2006 08:35 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.