TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast  

Go Back TriStateTuners.com :: Home of Tristate Auto Enthusiast > Community > Ask The Law
Register Rules & Info Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2007, 12:19 AM   #1
05suby
Tri-State Post Whore
 
05suby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aston
Member #5738

My Ride:
2005 WRX

iTrader: (1)
accident and ticket question

so on 10/26/07 my girlfriend got into an accident caused by a deer jumping in front of her suv. now this was one of those days where it was raining non stop for 3 or so days. she was on a back road on her way from school. like stated above, a deer jumped out in front of her suv and she swerved and ended up doing a 180 into a tree. she was going less then the posted speed limit. so long story short the state troopers said she wasn't going to recieve any citations in the mail because it was caused by a deer.

now today, 11/5/07, she recieved 2 citations in the mail. one of them really doesn't make sense. so here they are:

first citation: (the one that doesn't make sense)

driving on roadways laned for traffic

the trooper said " the defendant did operate above said vehicle in a manor and drove off roadway causing a crash. vehicle was not driven within a single lane."

now the manor causing her to crash was a deer. there was no mention of a deer on this citation, but on a paper she recieved from the trooper on the day of the accident, he noted a deer on it. she swerved and did a 180 into the opposing lane and then struck the tree.


second citation:

driving at a safe speed citation

i actually don't understand this one either. so now you can get a citation for driving at a safe speed? the trooper said " the defendant did operate above said vehicle at a speed greater than what will permit the driver to bring her vehicle to a stop within the assured safe distance ahead causing a crash." but here he is contradicting himself with the citation.

so again, the accident was cause by a deer. that still isn't stated in this citation. so i guess they went out there a couple of days later and conducted a field test to see that if driving the speed limit and swerving from a deer you should stop within "said" distance? the distance from where the deer jumped out at and where she hit the tree is no more, and i mean no more than 15 yrds. so i dont see how an suv can stop from going the posted speed limit of 25-30mph can stop safely from swerving to avoid a deer on wet ground that has been rained on for 3+ days.

now hitting the deer would/could have been bad. so i guess by these citations, she should have just struck the deer?

the car is totalled. so any help would be much appreciated. sorry for this being so long. hope i didn't take up too much of your time. if i did, my apologies.

thanks

Last edited by 05suby; 11-06-2007 at 12:24 AM.
05suby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:30 AM   #2
Sarge
Tri-State Addict
 
Sarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton
Member #5130

My Ride:
2006 Crown Victoria Police "Interceptor".

iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 05suby View Post
so on 10/26/07 my girlfriend got into an accident caused by a deer jumping in front of her suv. now this was one of those days where it was raining non stop for 3 or so days. she was on a back road on her way from school. like stated above, a deer jumped out in front of her suv and she swerved and ended up doing a 180 into a tree. she was going less then the posted speed limit. so long story short the state troopers said she wasn't going to recieve any citations in the mail because it was caused by a deer.

now today, 11/5/07, she recieved 2 citations in the mail. one of them really doesn't make sense. so here they are:

first citation: (the one that doesn't make sense)

driving on roadways laned for traffic

the trooper said " the defendant did operate above said vehicle in a manor and drove off roadway causing a crash. vehicle was not driven within a single lane."

now the manor causing her to crash was a deer. there was no mention of a deer on this citation, but on a paper she recieved from the trooper on the day of the accident, he noted a deer on it. she swerved and did a 180 into the opposing lane and then struck the tree.


second citation:

driving at a safe speed citation

i actually don't understand this one either. so now you can get a citation for driving at a safe speed? the trooper said " the defendant did operate above said vehicle at a speed greater than what will permit the driver to bring her vehicle to a stop within the assured safe distance ahead causing a crash."

so again, the accident was cause by a deer. that still isn't stated in this citation. so i guess they went out there a couple of days later and conducted a field test to see that if driving the speed limit and swerving from a deer you should stop within "said" distance? the distance from where the deer jumped out at and where she hit the tree is no more, and i mean no more than 15 yrds. so i dont see how an suv can stop from going the posted speed limit of 25-30mph can stop safely from swerving to avoid a deer on wet ground that has been rained on for 3+ days.

now hitting the deer would/could have been bad. so i guess by these citations, she should have just struck the deer?

the car is totalled. so any help would be much appreciated. sorry for this being so long. hope i didn't take up too much of your time. if i did, my apologies.

thanks
Without seeing the accident report I can only tell from your post that the trooper felt that she was "driving to fast for conditions" ie the rain slick roadway. As for the driving off road you should have her call the Trooper and ask him to explain the summons to her as to why she got them. If you don't aggree with the trooper after you speak to him. go to court you have a good chance that you can win on the driving off road that one seems weak.
__________________
Stay Safe
Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:38 AM   #3
05suby
Tri-State Post Whore
 
05suby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aston
Member #5738

My Ride:
2005 WRX

iTrader: (1)
ok thank you for your help. it just seems a little strange that the one citation says she drove a safe speed and was getting a citation for it, then he contradicts himself by saying she was to fast for the conditions. when we talked to him he said that she was driving the speed limit by the look of the accident and said there was going to be no citations given. but now she got them and he is saying total opposite.

i basically just dont understand how you get a citation for getting into an accident by avoiding a deer and then they throw in all this stuff about the speed when the clearly agreed she wasn't speeding. i also dont understand why there is no mention of a deer on the citation now, but on the accident report, it is there.
05suby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 01:11 AM   #4
The Law
Tri-State Aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Member #3357

 
iTrader: (0)
FYI

Quote:
§ 3309. Driving on roadways laned for traffic.
Whenever any roadway has been divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic the following rules in addition to all others not inconsistent therewith shall apply:


1. Driving within single lane.-A vehicle shall be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and shall not be moved from the lane until the driver has first ascertained that the movement can be made with safety.
2. Three lane roadways.-Upon a roadway which is divided into three lanes and provides for two-way movement of traffic, a vehicle shall not be driven in the center lane except when overtaking and passing another vehicle traveling in the same direction when the center lane is clear of traffic within a safe distance, or in preparation for making a left turn, or where the center lane is allocated exclusively to traffic moving in the same direction that the vehicle is proceeding and the allocation is designated by official traffic-control devices.
3. Lanes limited to specific use.-Official traffic-control devices may be erected to restrict the use of specified lanes to specified classes or types of traffic or vehicles, including multioccupant vehicles or car pools, and drivers of vehicles shall obey the directions of every such device.
4. Prohibitions against changing lanes.-Official traffic-control devices may be installed prohibiting the changing of lanes on a section of roadway and drivers of vehicles shall obey the directions of every such device.
Quote:
§ 3361. Driving vehicle at safe speed.
No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing, nor at a speed greater than will permit the driver to bring his vehicle to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead. Consistent with the foregoing, every person shall drive at a safe and appropriate speed when approaching and crossing an intersection or railroad grade crossing, when approaching and going around a curve, when approaching a hill crest, when traveling upon any narrow or winding roadway and when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
This 2nd ticket carries 2 points on a conviction, and if it makes it less confusing, is also referred to as "Driving too fast for conditions".
The Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 05:03 AM   #5
05suby
Tri-State Post Whore
 
05suby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aston
Member #5738

My Ride:
2005 WRX

iTrader: (1)
ok so what your saying is you can't swerve into other lanes to avoid a deer cause its against the law? cause if i read #1 right it said "shall not be moved from the lane until the driver has first ascertained that the movement can be made with safety." if there wasn't anyone around then im sure her avoiding the deer trying to keep her self safe by swerving was made with safety. she didn't end up in the other lane until the suv pulled a 180 and then into a tree.


and driving the speed limit is too fast for conditions? not to sound smart or anything but i've never heard of a speed limit for when it rains, as long as your doing the posted limit.


appreciate the response though.
05suby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 09:33 AM   #6
Sarge
Tri-State Addict
 
Sarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton
Member #5130

My Ride:
2006 Crown Victoria Police "Interceptor".

iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 05suby View Post
ok so what your saying is you can't swerve into other lanes to avoid a deer cause its against the law? cause if i read #1 right it said "shall not be moved from the lane until the driver has first ascertained that the movement can be made with safety." if there wasn't anyone around then im sure her avoiding the deer trying to keep her self safe by swerving was made with safety. she didn't end up in the other lane until the suv pulled a 180 and then into a tree.


and driving the speed limit is too fast for conditions? not to sound smart or anything but i've never heard of a speed limit for when it rains, as long as your doing the posted limit.


appreciate the response though.
Thanks LAW for the PA law info!

Now you don't need to contact the State Trooper for that info. I would advise you to go to court if the trooper wrote in his report you avoided a deer the judge may dismiss the summons... If the deer was BS that your girlfriend told the Trooper thinking it would avoid a summons pay the tickets. The court costs will run you more money if you can't prove your case.
Good Luck!
__________________
Stay Safe
Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 05:35 PM   #7
05suby
Tri-State Post Whore
 
05suby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aston
Member #5738

My Ride:
2005 WRX

iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarge View Post
Thanks LAW for the PA law info!

Now you don't need to contact the State Trooper for that info. I would advise you to go to court if the trooper wrote in his report you avoided a deer the judge may dismiss the summons... If the deer was BS that your girlfriend told the Trooper thinking it would avoid a summons pay the tickets. The court costs will run you more money if you can't prove your case.
Good Luck!
ok thank you. now how could we prove there was a deer if it was never hit? just doesn't add up. thanks for all of the information.
05suby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 05:57 PM   #8
Sarge
Tri-State Addict
 
Sarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton
Member #5130

My Ride:
2006 Crown Victoria Police "Interceptor".

iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 05suby View Post
ok thank you. now how could we prove there was a deer if it was never hit? just doesn't add up. thanks for all of the information.
I don't think you can prove there was a deer involved in the accident. I'm sure that what the invesigating officer felt too.

You still need to look at the accident report if the report says that the accident was caused by a deer you may be able to get rid of the summons for the lane change. I would bet she'll still have to pay the driving to fast for conditions summons. The posted speed is for clear and dry conditions, if the road is wet or icy or foggy you have to drive at a speed inwhich you can control you car. Most of the time that means slower then the posted limt.
I hope we have helped you
__________________
Stay Safe
Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 06:26 PM   #9
05suby
Tri-State Post Whore
 
05suby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aston
Member #5738

My Ride:
2005 WRX

iTrader: (1)
yes you guys definitely have helped. the accident report does have deer on it. i saw him write it and he even showed us for insurance purposes. thank you again so much for the help.
05suby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
car accident/totalled question XxIriponzeesxX General Car Related Chat 34 12-10-2010 04:01 PM
Accident Question neon98ACR Ask The Law 0 11-09-2010 12:38 PM
careless driving ticket due to car accident stover Ask The Law 4 10-02-2010 08:03 AM
Non-Reportable Accident question doug Ask The Law 1 03-17-2008 06:36 PM
accident report question 92talonTSI Off-Topic 7 01-20-2006 07:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.