|
All very true. The absurdity made it feel like I was on a hidden camera show. I testified that my exhaust was for performance, stated (under oath) how it improved gas milage by 2 mpg for both city and highway driving, and he still said that. It was ridiculous. he also made a derogatory comment when I started to quote Title 67 and Noise Regulations... he said "I've read title 67 more times than you've read History books." WTF? How does HE know what I've read and how many times I've read it? Not that I would make my situation worse, but I would have loved to have said, "Wow, considering I have a pH.D in History and am a professor at a local college, that's very impressive." lol I don't have my pH.D and I'm a scientist not a history professor, but I entertained the idea in my head which made me chuckle. It was ignorant of him to say something like that which is a shining example of the mentallity of both the judge and cop I was dealing with.
|