PDA

View Full Version : ive said it before, Ron Paul for president 2008


CHAOS
10-03-2008, 02:20 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK2QjMydQpU
mccain and obama are both idiots. this mother****er needs to run things.

frosti108
10-03-2008, 02:25 PM
your right. but sadly, no one takes him too seriously as a presidential candidate (mostly because hes not on every single commercial you see)

redline
10-03-2008, 02:28 PM
I agree 100%

D Money
10-03-2008, 02:33 PM
What about RuPaul? He/she is everything McCain, Obama, and Palin are together. Literally.

http://www.poolparty.com/quotes/images/2007/04/28/rupaul.jpg

frosti108
10-03-2008, 03:50 PM
rupaul is scary

btw, lol

james_ls
10-03-2008, 04:41 PM
He does have a very very good point.

I think at this point, as long as it's not more of the same...we'll manage.

poolmike
10-03-2008, 05:31 PM
Ron Paul is the man. He is right in so many ways it is scary.

SovXietday
10-03-2008, 11:49 PM
RP surely would be a better candidate, but last I heard he was suggesting that we may go under martial law. :/

ozthunder
10-04-2008, 12:59 AM
I love most of what he says, but Arnold Schwarzenegger has more of a chance of being president than him, and it's more productive waiting for a dead guy to be resurrected than for America to elect him. :paranoid:

garrettej8
10-04-2008, 01:12 AM
I know it's pointless to say this but america would would so much better off with RP as the president. oh well, maybe he can still do some good. he has a great fanbase and it's building constantly but it's just not moving at a fast rate and it's too late now.

ozthunder
10-04-2008, 01:18 AM
His movement is too "niche". Not to say that it's a "problem" per se, it just doesn't fit into the mainstream (although I believe it could eventually).

MotorED
10-04-2008, 01:23 AM
your right. but sadly, no one takes him too seriously as a presidential candidate (mostly because hes not on every single commercial you see)

x2....

CHAOS
10-04-2008, 06:06 AM
His movement is too "niche". Not to say that it's a "problem" per se, it just doesn't fit into the mainstream (although I believe it could eventually).

right but you have to agree that its pretty much exactly what we need... a complete 180 of what we are doing now ya know

Chair-Force
10-04-2008, 08:20 AM
he has NO CHANCE of ever being president.
move on, chaos.

CHAOS
10-04-2008, 08:23 AM
he has NO CHANCE of ever being president.
move on, chaos.

why you mad son?

Chair-Force
10-04-2008, 08:24 AM
why you mad son?

just mailed my rent and im cranky now.

240sxDann
10-04-2008, 10:41 AM
I'm voting for ralph nader.

ozthunder
10-04-2008, 10:57 AM
right but you have to agree that its pretty much exactly what we need... a complete 180 of what we are doing now ya know

If the executive had as much power to do what he wants, yes. It simply doesn't and there is more to the equation. Not to mention I'd be scared to death of the choices he'd have for the Court.

05suby
10-04-2008, 08:27 PM
i wish